Buffer vs ONYX for BlueSky Scheduling

Buffer and ONYX solve related problems from different directions. Buffer is built as a broad social media platform. ONYX is built specifically around BlueSky scheduling.

That difference matters more than a feature checklist. The right choice depends on whether BlueSky is one channel among many or the channel you are trying to grow.

Choose Buffer if you need many networks

Buffer can make sense if your workflow depends on managing multiple social platforms from one place. Teams that need cross-network publishing may prefer one broad dashboard.

Choose ONYX if BlueSky is the priority

ONYX makes more sense if you want a focused BlueSky queue, AI Voice drafts, thread tools, and analytics designed around BlueSky content decisions.

A focused tool can be easier for creators and founders because there is less to configure and less noise in the interface.

AI drafting and voice

The important question is not whether a tool has AI. The question is whether the AI helps you write posts that still sound like you. ONYX AI Voice is designed for that workflow: draft options, human editing, then scheduling.

Pricing and starting small

If you are testing BlueSky as a channel, starting small matters. ONYX Free lets you schedule 5 posts per month without a credit card. Upgrade only when the queue is clearly useful.

Try ONYX for BlueSky scheduling and compare the workflow yourself.